Yf-23 6th Gen - Here's what you need to know: The F-23 includes some of the same features that a sixth-generation fighter could.
The Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) race at the end of the Cold War produced some spectacular combat designs. The United States would eventually choose the F-22 Raptor, recognized as the most capable air superiority aircraft of the early twenty-first century. The defeated YF-23 now graces museums in Torrance, California, and Dayton, Ohio.
Yf-23 6th Gen
What decision did the Pentagon make on the F-22 and what was the impact of that decision? We'll never know, but going with the F-22 Raptor could save the Pentagon some major headaches.
Meet The F 52 Stealth Fighter (that Doesn't Exist)
ATF competition began in the early 1980s, when it became clear that the Soviet Army was developing fighters (the MiG-29 and Su-27) capable of competing effectively with the US Air Force (USAF) F-15. was planning to do. /F-16 "high-low" mix. The ATF would allow the US to gain its advantage over potential bases (especially covert ones) that the Soviet Union would struggle to compete with.
To a large extent, the success of one of ATF's competitors has been more determined. The Soviet Union disappeared during the competition, and the major European aerospace powers refused to compete in the same area (stealth, supercruise and eventually sensor fusion). Either the F-22 or the F-23 will be the best fighters of the early 21st century; The only question was which aircraft project would win the investment. And each aircraft had its advantages. The YF-23 had better supercruise than the F-22, and by some accounts better stealth performance. The F-22 offered a slightly simpler, less threatening design as well as incredible agility, making it a formidable dogfighter.
As Dave Mazumdar noted a year ago, political and bureaucratic factors contributed to the selection of the F-22. Bored with Northrop and (still independent) McDonnell Douglas after the B-2 and A-12 projects, the Pentagon favored Lockheed. The US Navy, for specific reasons, disliked the F-23 and hoped to crack the highly modified F-22. For its part, the Air Force prioritized the F-22's incredible maneuverability, which gave it an advantage in nearly every possible combat situation. In some ways, the F-22 (and to a lesser extent its Russian rival, the PAK-FA) represents the ultimate air superiority fighter of the jet age. They are capable of challenging and defeating their opponents in all possible aspects of combat, as well as having stealth characteristics that allow them to engage in (or avoid engaging in) highly advantageous situations.
Had the ATF competition not coincided with the collapse of the Soviet Union, the YF-23 would have had a chance to be revived. Some of its features were developed enough to receive more attention and investment. Furthermore, building the F-23 as well as the F-22 could be justified on the grounds of maintaining the health of the US defense industrial base; The decision to consolidate Boeing and McDonnell Douglas was undoubtedly inspired by the choice of Lockheed Aircraft.
Did Lockheed Martin Tease A New Image Of The Ngad Fighter?
Like the X-32, the YF-23 never suffered from the F-22 Raptor's most serious problems. It never experienced cost overruns, technology failures, software glitches, or breathing problems that killed pilots. Problems that routinely plague new defense designs (to be fair, pilot chokes are often unique to the Raptor) were the result. In the context of the wider demands of the war on terrorism, Defense Secretary Robert Gates has reduced F-22 production to 187 operational aircraft, while the fighter jet itself struggles. Although it made sense at the time, it left the USAF with a combat deficit that only the F-35 could fill.
Had the YF-23 had that development path (a big "if"), the fighter would not have faced such a hostile environment when it entered service. But given that the YF-23 is generally regarded as an innovative (and therefore dangerous) design, and costs a bit more, it's even less likely to go through without a hitch. Design and production challenges may leave the USAF with even fewer operational fighters.
The F-23 eventually incorporated some of the features that the Air Force would find a "deep deterrent" for the sixth generation to achieve its goals. For example, the V-tail aspect was mentioned in some of the earliest concepts of next-generation fighter aircraft. And Boeing will undoubtedly turn to its experience with the F-23 when thinking about its next fighter.
One of two YF-23 prototypes sat for many years in a junk aircraft hangar (officially known as the Research and Development Hangar) at the National Museum of the United States Air Force in Dayton, Ohio. The YF-23 lies beneath the XB-70 Valkyrie, the centerpiece of the museum's collection. Both aircraft moved to the museum's newly opened fourth building, where they continue to represent an alternative vision of the Air Force's (past) future, a vision deeply rooted in the industrial and organizational realities of the US Air Force.
Manufacture :: Platz :: Platz 1/72 U.s.a.f. Prototype Fighter Yf 23
, He is a Senior Lecturer at the University of Kentucky's Patterson School of Diplomacy and International Commerce. His assignments include military doctrine, national security, and maritime affairs. He blogs what you need to know here: If the YF-23's development path had been (a big "if"), the fighter might not have faced such a hostile environment when it entered service. But given that the YF-23 is generally regarded as an innovative (and therefore dangerous) design, and costs a bit more, it's even less likely to go through without a hitch.
The Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) race at the end of the Cold War produced some spectacular combat designs. The United States would eventually choose the F-22 Raptor, recognized as the most capable air superiority aircraft of the early twenty-first century. The defeated YF-23 now graces museums in Torrance, California, and Dayton, Ohio.
What decision did the Pentagon make on the F-22 and what was the impact of that decision? We'll never know, but going with the F-22 Raptor could save the Pentagon some major headaches.
ATF competition began in the early 1980s, when it became apparent that the Soviets were planning to develop fighter jets (the MiG-29 and Su-27) that would effectively replace the United States Air Force (USAF) F-15. compete with. /F-16 "high-low" mix. The ATF would allow the US to gain its advantage over potential bases (especially covert ones) that the Soviet Union would struggle to compete with.
The Yf 23's Air Inlet Design Was Its Most Exotic Feature You Never Heard Of
To a large extent, the success of one of ATF's competitors has been more determined. The Soviet Union disappeared during the competition, and the major European aerospace powers refused to compete in the same area (stealth, supercruise and eventually sensor fusion). Either the F-22 or the F-23 will be the best fighters of the early 21st century; The only question was which aircraft project would win the investment. And each aircraft had its advantages. The YF-23 had better supercruise than the F-22, and by some accounts better stealth performance. The F-22 offered a slightly simpler, less threatening design as well as incredible agility, making it a formidable dogfighter.
As Dave Mazumdar noted a year ago, political and bureaucratic factors contributed to the selection of the F-22. Bored with Northrop and (still independent) McDonnell Douglas after the B-2 and A-12 projects, the Pentagon favored Lockheed. The US Navy, for specific reasons, disliked the F-23 and hoped to crack the highly modified F-22. For its part, the Air Force prioritized the F-22's incredible maneuverability, which gave it an edge in nearly every possible combat situation. In some ways, the F-22 (and to a lesser extent its Russian rival, the PAK-FA) represent the ultimate expression of jet-age air superiority. They are capable of challenging and defeating their opponents in all possible aspects of combat, as well as having stealth characteristics that allow them to engage in (or avoid engaging in) highly advantageous situations.
Had the ATF competition not coincided with the collapse of the Soviet Union, the YF-23 would have had a chance to be revived. Some of its features were developed enough to receive more attention and investment. Furthermore, building the F-23 as well as the F-22 could be justified on the grounds of maintaining the health of the US defense industrial base; The choice of Lockheed aircraft certainly contributed to the decision to consolidate Boeing and McDonnell Douglas.
Like the X-32, the YF-23 never suffered from the F-22 Raptor's most serious problems. It has never experienced cost overruns, technical glitches, software crashes or breathing problems that have killed pilots. These problems, which regularly plague new defense designs (to be fair, pilot chokes are often unique to the Raptor) were the result. In the context of the wider demands of the War on Terror, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates reduced F-22 production to 187 operational aircraft. Although understood at the time, it's gone
Ngad: The Air Force Already Has A Prototype 6th Generation Fighter. Now Comes The Hard Part
Yf-23 model, 1 72 yf 23, yf 23 aircraft, yf 23, yf 23 model kit, northrop grumman yf 23, yf 23 rc, yf-23 black widow, yf-23, yf 23 rc plane, yf 23 fighter, 1 48 yf 23
0 Comments